United States v. Ronald Peppers

Good Law
697 F.3d 1217·2012 WL 4902819·2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 21596
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 17, 201211-30322California973 words

Opinion

Opinion

Ronald Charles Peppers appeals his conviction for assaulting a federal officer, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 111 (a)(1). We affirm.

BACKGROUND

On October 17, 2010, Special Agent Brian Kimball of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and several other law enforcement officers attempted to apprehend Peppers at the residence of his mother, Roberta Arnoux. Earlier that day, Arnoux had informed the officers that Peppers was asleep in her trailer home but warned that she kept an unloaded shotgun under her bed.

Around midnight, the officers entered Arnoux’s darkened trailer and found Peppers sleeping on a couch. As the officers attempted to apprehend Peppers, a struggle ensued, during which Peppers bit Special Agent Kimball’s arm. The officers placed Peppers under arrest shortly thereafter.

Following an indictment, Peppers proceeded to trial on one count of being a felon in possession of a firearm, which was dismissed at the close of the government’s case-in-chief, and one count of assault on a federal officer. At trial, Peppers testified in his own defense, claiming that at the time of his arrest, he believed he was resisting violent attackers, not law enforcement officers,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.