Irving Humphrey v. James Yates

Good Law
486 F. App'x 661
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 17, 201211-17844California278 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Irving C. Humphrey, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indiffer ence to his serious medical needs in connection with his exposure to valley fever. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo, Toguchi v. Chung, 891 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir.2004), and we affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment for defendant Yates because Humphrey failed to establish a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether Yates personally participated in any alleged constitutional violations. See Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 676 , 129 S.Ct. 1937 , 173 L.Ed.2d 868 (2009) (a plaintiff must plead that each defendant violated the Constitution through his own individual actions); Taylor v. List, 880 F.2d 1040, 1045 (9th Cir.1989) (supervisor is liable for constitutional violations of subordinates only if he “participated in or directed the violations, or knew of the violations and failed to act to prevent them”); see also Toguchi, 391 F.3d at 1058 (prison officials act with deliberate indifference only if they know of and disregard an excessive risk to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.