Widjaja

MEMORANDUM

Johnson Widjaja, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, Wakkary v. Holder, 558 F.3d 1049, 1056 (9th Cir.2009), upholding the BIA’s determination “unless the evidence compels a reasonable factfinder to reach a contrary result.” Husyev v. Mukasey, 528 F.3d 1172, 1182 (9th Cir.2008). We review de novo claims of due process violations in immigration proceedings. Sandoval-Luna v. Mukasey, 526 F.3d 1243, 1246 (9th Cir.2008). We dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.

I.

We lack jurisdiction to review the IJ’s finding that Widjaja’s asylum application is time-barred, because it involves disputed facts. 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (a)(2)(B), (a)(3); see also Ramadan v. Gonzales, 479 F.3d 646, 648 (9th Cir.2007). Widjaja’s assertion that the agency violated his due process rights by failing to evaluate the evidence…