United States v. Cyprian Adoh, Sr.

Good Law
496 F. App'x 731
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 23, 201211-50108California706 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Cyprian 0. Adoh appeals from his sentence imposed following a guilty plea to one count of conspiracy to commit health care fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1349 . Adoh contends that his plea was not knowing and voluntary because the district court did not inform him that upon conviction he was subject to mandatory exclusion from participation in federally funded health programs under 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7(a)(3).

Because Adoh did not raise this argument before the district court, we review for plain error. E.g., United States v. Delgado-Ramos, 635 F.3d 1237, 1238 (9th Cir.2011) (per curiam). Under the plain error standard as applied to a guilty plea, Adoh “must show a reasonable probability that, but for [any] error, he would not have entered the plea.” United States v. Dominguez Benitez, 542 U.S. 74, 83 , 124 S.Ct. 2333 , 159 L.Ed.2d 157 (2004).

Adoh has not demonstrated a reasonable probability that he would not have pled guilty had he been informed of the exclusion of which he now complains. Section 1320a-7(a)(3) bars an individual convicted of a health care fraud felony from being paid by a federally funded health program for providing products or services. See 42…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.