Marla James v. The City of Costa Mesa

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 1, 201210-55769California11,052 words

Opinion

Opinion

FISHER, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARLA JAMES; WAYNE  No. 10-55769 WASHINGTON; JAMES ARMANTROUT; D.C. No. CHARLES DANIEL DEJONG, 8:10-cv-00402- Plaintiffs-Appellants, AG-MLG v. ORDER CITY OF COSTA MESA, a city AMENDING incorporated under the laws of the OPINION AND State of California; CITY OF LAKE PARTIAL FOREST, a city incorporated under  CONCURRENCE/ the laws of the State of California, PARTIAL Defendants-Appellees. DISSENT AND

DENYING

PETITION FOR

REHEARING AND

REHEARING EN

BANC AND

AMENDED

 OPINION

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Andrew J. Guilford, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted May 6, 2011—Pasadena, California

May 21, 2012 Amended November 1, 2012

13057 13058 JAMES v. CITY OF COSTA MESA Before: Harry Pregerson, Raymond C. Fisher and Marsha S. Berzon, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Fisher; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge Berzon 13060 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.