In re Pon

Good Law
94 Daily Journal DAR 4150·1994 WL 72660·164 B.R. 322·1994 Bankr. LEXIS 280
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 7, 1994Bankruptcy No. 93-3-0199-TCCalifornia1,786 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Carlson, J.

Debtor seeks summary judgment disallowing a $1.7 million claim asserted against her as a guarantor. The principal issue is whether Debtor validly waived the “Gmdsky defense,” under which a lender may not recover from a guarantor any deficiency remaining *323 after a nonjudicial foreclosure on real property securing the principal obligation. I determine that Debtor waived the defense and deny her motion for summary judgment. FACTS

The relevant facts are not disputed. In October 1989, Golden Diamond Investments (GDI) obtained a $3.0 million construction loan from Bank of America (the Bank). The loan was secured by a deed of trust on real property located at 2240 Union Street in San Francisco. Debtor Virginia Pon, a principal of GDI, guaranteed the loan. GDI defaulted on the loan, and the Bank conducted a nonjudicial foreclosure of the Union Street property. The Bank was not paid in full from the proceeds of the foreclosure sale, and now asserts a claim against Debtor as guarantor for $1,716,838.47.

Debtor seeks summary judgment disallowing the Bank’s claim, contending that the Bank may not recover the deficiency from her as guarantor under the doctrine of Union Bank v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.