United States v. Adrian Solarzano

Good Law
492 F. App'x 820
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 13, 201211-50057California267 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Adrian Solarzano pleaded guilty to one count of racketeering conspiracy in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (d), one count of conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 , one count of possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1), and one count of being a felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g)(1). The district court sentenced Solarzano to concurrent prison terms totaling 293 months, to be served consecutively to the remaining nine months of an undischarged state court sentence.

Solarzano’s only argument on appeal is that the district court erred by ordering the federal sentences to run consecutively to the state court sentence. His arguments regarding § 5G1.3(b) of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, which were raised for the first time in the reply brief, are waived. United States v. Anderson, 472 F.3d 662, 668 (9th Cir.2006). And his reliance on § 5G1.3(c) does not help him, because that subsection gives the district court discretion to impose either consecutive or concurrent sentences. United States v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.