United States v. Michael Minjarez

Good Law
495 F. App'x 857
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 14, 201211-10390California1,010 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Michael Minjarez (“Minjarez”) was convicted in federal court of armed credit union robbery, armed bank robbery, and bank robbery. During trial, the government called Marie Centeno, a cousin of Lisa Minjarez, Michael Minjarez’s wife. Centeno testified that a car seen near the location of two of the robberies was similar to the car that she loaned Lisa Minjarez in August 2009. During cross-examination, defense counsel elicited from Centeno that she did not like Minjarez because she believed that Minjarez had caused a rift between Centeno and Lisa Minjarez. On redirect, the prosecutor asked Centeno why the rift existed. Centeno explained that she thought Minjarez robbed Lisa Minja-rez’s house.

Defense counsel objected and moved to strike Centeno’s response. The court granted the motion to strike and sustained the objection, admonishing the jury to disregard Centeno’s reply, and to “put it out of your minds as if you had not heard it.” Defense counsel moved for a mistrial, which the court denied. After Centeno completed her testimony, the court again admonished the jury to disregard Cen-teno’s testimony about her reason for disliking Minjarez.

Denial of a motion for a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.