Winston Walters v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
498 F. App'x 685
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 16, 201211-72772California355 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Winston Valentine Walters, a native and citizen of Jamaica, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) removal order. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence the agency’s determination that petitioner knowingly engaged in drug trafficking, Gomez-Granillo v. Holder, 654 F.3d 826, 836 (9th Cir.2011), and review de novo constitutional claims, Gutierrez v. Holder, 662 F.3d 1083, 1086 (9th Cir.2011). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Walters is inadmissible under 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (a)(2)(C)(i) as an illicit trafficker in a controlled substance, where an Immigration Customs Enforcement agent and a narcotics detective independently confirmed that Walters admitted to expecting a package with a large sum of money that he planned to use to purchase marijuana, and the package was addressed to Walters and contained $69,800. Contrary to Walters’ assertion, 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (a)(2)(C)(i) does not require a criminal conviction to establish inadmissibility. See…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.