United States v. Pablo Medina-Ruiz

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 19, 201211-10545California241 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOV 19 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 11-10545 11-10546 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. Nos. 2:11-cr-50078-DGC v. 2:11-cr-50139-DGC

PABLO ARMANDO MEDINA-RUIZ, MEMORANDUM *

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona David G. Campbell, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 13, 2012 **

Before: CANBY, TROTT, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

In these consolidated appeals, Pablo Armando Medina-Ruiz appeals from

the revocation of his supervised release and the concurrent 24-month sentences

imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Medina-Ruiz’s counsel has filed a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.