Yuddy Hartono v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
488 F. App'x 254
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 19, 201210-72073California388 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Yuddy Hartono, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . Reviewing for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, Wakkary v. Holder, 558 F.3d 1049, 1056 (9th Cir.2009), we deny in part and grant in part the petition for review, and remand for further proceedings.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s denial of CAT relief because Hartono failed to demonstrate it is more likely than not he will be tortured if returned to Indonesia. See Wakkary, 558 F.3d at 1067-68 . Accordingly, Hartono’s CAT claim fails.

With respect to asylum and withholding of removal, Hartono alleges native Indonesian youths repeatedly beat him, and, while in high school, a native Indonesian youth broke his nose and a mob of Muslims attacked him, beat him with a metal pipe and wooden stick, and burned his chest with cigarettes. Substantial evi dence does not support the BIA’s finding that these…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.