Eladio Rosales-Rodriguez v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
487 F. App'x 394
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 19, 201210-70287California284 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Eladio Rosales-Rodríguez, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir.2006), and we deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s finding that, even if credible, Rosales-Rodríguez failed to demonstrate that the harm he and his family suffered from the army, guerrillas, and unknown assailants was on account of a protected ground. See INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 483 , 112 S.Ct. 812 , 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992) (some evidence of a persecutor’s motive — direct or circumstantial — must be provided to establish eligibility for asylum); Molina-Estrada v. INS, 293 F.3d 1089, 1094-95 (9th Cir.2002) (evidence did not compel conclusion that guerillas attacked family on account of a protected ground); Alonzo v. INS, 915 F.2d 546, 548 (9th Cir.1990) (conscription attempts by military not persecution absent…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.