United States v. John Jingles
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 19, 201208-15634California4,852 words
Opinion
Opinion
Wallace, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , No. 08-15634 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. v. 2:04-CV-02090-
FCD-CMK
JOHN WESLEY JINGLES, 2:98-CR-00431-
Defendant-Appellant. FCD-CMK
ORDER
AMENDING
OPINION AND
AMENDED
OPINION
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Frank C. Damrell, Senior District Judge, Presiding
Argued March 13, 2012 Submitted June 8, 2012—San Francisco, California
Filed June 8, 2012 Amended November 19, 2012
Before: J. Clifford Wallace, Dorothy W. Nelson, and Carlos T. Bea, Circuit Judges. UNITED STATES V . JINGLES
Order; Amended Opinion by Judge Wallace
SUMMARY*
Habeas Corpus
The panel affirmed the district court’s denial of a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to set aside convictions and sentences for two counts of possession with intent to distribute cocaine base.
Jingles contended in his § 2255 motion that the verdict forms constructively amended the indictment in violation of his Fifth Amendment rights by asking the jury to determine whether the substance he possessed was…