Brenda Whinery v. William Aubrey

Good Law
491 F. App'x 833·486 B.R. 833
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 21, 201211-15873California217 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

William Aubrey and Brenda B. Todd appeal pro se from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order determining that their debt to Fort Defiance Housing Corp. was nondischargeable under 11 U.S.C. § 523 (a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158 (d). We review decisions of the bankruptcy court independently without deference to the district court’s determinations, Leichty v. Neary, (In re Strand), 375 F.3d 854, 857 (9th Cir.2004), and we affirm.

The bankruptcy court properly determined that the debt in question was non-dischargeable because a prior decision between the parties necessarily decided that the money at issue was obtained by “false pretenses” and that Aubrey and Todd inflicted “willful and malicious injury” on Fort Defiance Housing Corp. 11 U.S.C. §§ 523 (a)(2)(A), (a)(6); Ormsby v. First Am. Title Co. of Nev. (In re Ormsby), 591 F.3d 1199, 1206-07 (9th Cir.2010) (setting forth elements under § 523(a)(6)); Harmon v. Kobrin (In re Harmon), 250 F.3d 1240, 1245-46 (9th Cir.2001) (explaining that “[principles of collateral estoppel apply to proceedings seeking exceptions from discharge brought under 11 U.S.C. § 523 (a),” and setting forth…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.