Diego Armando Segundo v. Holder

Good Law
488 F. App'x 261
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 23, 201206-70398California286 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Diego Armando Segundo, a native and citizen of Mexico, has petitioned for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) dismissal of his appeal from an immigration judge’s denial of his application for cancellation of removal for failure to meet the ten-year continuous presence requirement. We previously referred his petition to the court’s mediation office, along with those of his co-petitioners. Their cases in this court have been terminated, and we are asked to decide only Armando Segundo’s petition.

Petitioner seeks relief from the ten-year continuous presence requirement under the equitable-tolling doctrine due to the bad advice he received from prior counsel, and he argues that the BIA’s failure to grant such relief violated his due process rights. As a result, he argues that the end date of his continuous presence should be equitably tolled, or extended, from the date on which he received his Notice to Appear to the date on which he retained competent counsel.

It is clear that Petitioner’s original counsel misadvised him to apply for relief when he had not yet met the ten-year period of continuous presence required for cancellation of removal. Equitable…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.