Lawrence Saccato v. Davis Law Firm

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 26, 201212-35133California427 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOV 26 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LAWRENCE JAMES SACCATO, No. 12-35133

Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 6:10-cv-06244-HO

v.

MEMORANDUM *

DAVIS LAW FIRM; U.S. BANK

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION N.D.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael R. Hogan, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 13, 2012 **

Before: CANBY, TROTT, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Lawrence James Saccato appeals pro se from the district court’s summary

judgment in his Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”) action alleging that defendant

U.S. Bank failed to conduct a reasonable investigation upon receiving notice that

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Saccato disputed whether he had held a U.S. Bank account as reflected on his

credit report.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.