Lawrence Saccato v. Davis Law Firm
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 26, 201212-35133California427 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOV 26 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LAWRENCE JAMES SACCATO, No. 12-35133
Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 6:10-cv-06244-HO
v.
MEMORANDUM *
DAVIS LAW FIRM; U.S. BANK
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION N.D.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael R. Hogan, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 13, 2012 **
Before: CANBY, TROTT, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Lawrence James Saccato appeals pro se from the district court’s summary
judgment in his Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”) action alleging that defendant
U.S. Bank failed to conduct a reasonable investigation upon receiving notice that
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Saccato disputed whether he had held a U.S. Bank account as reflected on his
credit report.…