Curlin Pennick, III v. Dawn Thompson

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 26, 201211-35882California289 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT NOV 26 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

CURLIN PENNICK, III, No. 11-35882

Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 3:11-cv-05175-RBL

v.

MEMORANDUM *

DAWN THOMPSON, in her individual capacities,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Ronald B. Leighton, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 13, 2012 **

Before: CANBY, TROTT, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Curlin Pennick, III, a Washington state prisoner, appeals pro se from the

district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that

defendant violated his Fourteenth Amendment due process rights by incorrectly

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). depositing education funds in his spendable account and for failing to adequately

correct this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.