Keith Brown v. Tony Ingrahm

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 27, 201211-35862California359 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOV 27 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KEITH A. BROWN, No. 11-35862

Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:08-cv-00382-EJL

v.

MEMORANDUM *

TONY INGRAHM; KEVIN DUNTON,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho Edward J. Lodge, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 13, 2012 **

Before: CANBY, TROTT, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Idaho state prisoner Keith A. Brown appeals pro se from the district court’s

summary judgment dismissing his action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and

Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 388 (1971) alleging false arrest and false imprisonment. We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. §1291. We review de novo. Jones v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.