Jason Sutton v. Eldon Vail

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 27, 201211-35513California347 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOV 27 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JASON J. LEE SUTTON, No. 11-35513

Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:11-cv-05023-JLQ

v.

MEMORANDUM *

ELDON VAIL; et al.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Justin L. Quackenbush, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 13, 2012 **

Before: CANBY, TROTT, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Washington state prisoner Jason J. Lee Sutton appeals pro se from the

district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging denial of

the right to practice his religion in violation of the First Amendment, the Religious

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, Sutton’s request for oral argument is denied. Land Use and Institutionalized Person’s Act…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.