Thomas Hargrove v. Washington State Department Of
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 27, 201211-35470California272 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOV 27 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
THOMAS RANDALL HARGROVE; Nos. 11-35470
MICHAEL STEVEN NOVAK, 11-35518
Plaintiffs - Appellants, D.C. No. 2:10-cv-00363-RBL
v.
MEMORANDUM *
WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT
OF CORRECTIONS; et al.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Ronald B. Leighton, District Judge, Presiding
** Submitted November 13, 2012
Before: CANBY, TROTT, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
In these consolidated appeals, Washington state prisoners Thomas Randall
Hargrove and Michael Steven Novak appeal pro se from the district court’s
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes these cases are suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). judgment dismissing their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging First Amendment
violations. We have…