United States v. Eduardo Arias-Espinosa

Good Law
704 F.3d 616·2012 WL 5975131·2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 24658
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 30, 201211-10663California1,311 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gould, J.

Eduardo Arias-Espinosa appeals his 51-month sentence for illegal re-entry into the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 , as enhanced by § 1326(b)(2). The government contends that Arias-Espinosa waived his right to appeal in his written plea agreement. We agree and dismiss this appeal.

I

Arias-Espinosa pleaded guilty to illegal re-entry into the United States and signed a written plea agreement. The agreement included an explicit waiver of his right to appeal his conviction and any sentence imposed within the range permitted by the agreement. At the change of plea hearing before a magistrate judge, Arias-Espinosa said that his counsel had explained the plea agreement and that he understood it. He also said that he understood that he was waiving his right to appeal. The magistrate judge in his findings and recommendations told the district court that Arias-Espinosa had knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his right to appeal as stipulated in the plea agreement. At the sentencing hearing, the district court adopted the magistrate judge’s findings and accepted Arias-Espinosa’s guilty plea. The court sentenced Arias-Espinosa to 51 months, within the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.