Eric Dungan v. Ron Barnes

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 6, 201211-17992California263 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 06 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ERIC KENNETH DUNGAN, No. 11-17992

Petitioner - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:10-cv-01191-DAD

v.

MEMORANDUM *

RON BARNES, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Dale A. Drozd, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 25, 2012 **

Before: HUG, FARRIS, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Eric Kenneth Dungan appeals pro se from the

district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Dungan contends that insufficient evidence was presented at trial to support

his conviction for second degree murder. We agree with the district court that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.