United States v. Jorge Oliva

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 17, 201210-30126California5,525 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fisher, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , No. 10-30126 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 3:07-cr-00050-

BR-

JORGE ORTIZ OLIVA , AKA Jorge Cortez Almonte, AKA Jorge Meras Barajas, Defendant-Appellant.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , No. 10-30134 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 3:07-cr-00050-

BR-

PABLO BARAJAS LOPEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

ORDER AND

AMENDED

OPINION

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Anna J. Brown, District Judge, Presiding UNITED STATES V . OLIVA

Argued and Submitted November 18, 2011*—Portland, Oregon

Filed July 20, 2012 Amended December 17, 2012

Before: Raymond C. Fisher, Richard A. Paez, and Richard R. Clifton, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Fisher

SUMMARY**

Criminal Law

The panel filed an amended opinion in a case in which it affirmed the district court’s denial of a motion to suppress evidence obtained from a series of electronic surveillance orders authorizing interception of communications over cellular phones associated with the defendant and his alleged…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.