United States v. Lenny Lizalde

Good Law
502 F. App'x 655
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 19, 201210-50445California1,159 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Lenny Lizalde appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (c)(2) and Amendment 505 to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines (“Guidelines” or “U.S.S.G.”). For the reasons discussed below, we conclude that Mr. Lizalde is not eligible for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), and accordingly, we affirm the district court’s denial of the motion.

Mr. Lizalde was convicted of five narcotics offenses. His Presentence Report (“PSR”) provided for a base offense level of 40, based on the amount of drugs involved in the crimes, with a 4-level increase for Mr. Lizalde’s role in the offense, leading to a total offense level of 44. The PSR also provided for a criminal history category of I. Mr. Lizalde’s total offense level and criminal history category resulted in a life sentence under the Guidelines, which is the sentence that the PSR recommended. But the district court imposed a 300-month sentence, comprised of 240 months for Counts 1-4, to be served consecutively to a term of 60 months for Count 5.

More than 17 years after he was sentenced, Mr. Lizalde filed with the district court, over the course of two years,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.