Danielson

Danielson v. Flores

Good Law
704 F.3d 1067·2012 WL 6618328·486 B.R. 1279·2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 25928
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 19, 201211-55452California52 words

Opinion

Kozinski, J.

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.