Rachel Pizan v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 28, 201211-72380California290 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 28 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RACHEL ERIKA PIZAN, a.k.a. Rachel No. 11-72380 Erika Alcalde, a.k.a. Rachel Erika Bigler, a.k.a. Rachel de Alcalde, a.k.a. Rachel Agency No. A077-970-039 Piza, a.k.a. Rachel Pizan,

Petitioner, MEMORANDUM *

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 19, 2012**

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

Rachel Erika Pizan, a native and citizen of Peru, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reopen

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for

abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.