Mariano Ramirez-Pablo v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
489 F. App'x 210
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 28, 201210-72251California264 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Milton Vargas, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence, Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153 , 1156 (9th Cir.2003), and we deny the petition for review.

Vargas claims he experienced past persecution and fears future persecution because of threats he received while working for the Christian Democratic Party between 1989 and 1992. Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination based on inconsistencies in the record regarding who Vargas campaigned for and when his candidate won the election, see id., and his untruthful statement that he did not make a return trip to Guatemala in 1999 after leaving in 1992, see Singh v. Holder, 643 F.3d 1178, 1181 (9th Cir.2011) (“An asylum applicant who lies to immigration authorities casts doubt on his credibility and the rest of his story.”). In the absence of credible testimony, Vargas’ asylum and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.