David Oster v. John Wagner

Good Law
504 F. App'x 555
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 7, 201309-17581California297 words

Opinion

Opinion

ORDER

This case is resubmitted as of the filing date of this order. Defendants-Appellants appeal the district court’s order preliminarily enjoining the State of California from implementing “ABX4 4.” See California Welfare and Institutions Code §§ 12309(e) & 12309.2. The panel finds that in light of California’s suspension statute, see California Welfare and Institutions Code §§ 12309(i) & 12309.2(e), this appeal no longer presents a “live controversy” amenable to federal court adjudication because the panel can no longer grant effective relief. Log Cabin Republicans v. United States, 658 F.3d 1162, 1166 (9th Cir.2011) (citation omitted). Although the district court preliminarily enjoined the State of California from implementing ABX4 4 until a final judgment is reached on the merits, the suspension statute prevents the State from implementing ABX4 4 until the courts uphold the validity of ABX4 4. See California Welfare and Institutions Code §§ 12309(i) & 12309.2(e). Thus, the district court’s preliminary injunction no longer has any practical effect. We also find that Defendants-Appellants’ appeal of the district court’s order holding them in contempt for violating the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.