United States v. Matthew Jensen

Good Law
705 F.3d 976·2013 WL 174387·2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 880
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 14, 201311-10472California1,711 words

Opinion

Opinion

Graber, J.

Defendant Matthew Steven Jensen appeals his sentence of 27 months’ imprisonment, following a conviction for failing to appear in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 3146 . The parties dispute which subsection of 18 U.S.C. § 3146 (b)(1)(A) establishes the appropriate maximum prison term in this circumstance: subsection (ii), which carries a five-year maximum, or subsection (iii), which carries a two-year maximum. Reviewing de novo this question of statutory interpretation, United States v. Youssef, 547 F.3d 1090, 1093 (9th Cir.2008) (per curiam), we join the First, Sixth, and Seventh Circuits in holding that we determine the applicable maximum by looking to the underlying criminal offense, rather than to an intervening violation of supervised release. Here, because the underlying offense was punishable by a prison term of five years or more, the five-year maximum prison term found in subsection (ii) applies. Accordingly, we affirm.

In 2009, Defendant pleaded guilty to one count of unlawful possession of a mail key in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1704 . That offense carried a maximum prison term of ten years. Id. The district court sentenced Defendant to 12 months’ imprisonment, followed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.