Jose Huerta-Pena v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
505 F. App'x 637
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 16, 201311-72195California252 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Jose Huerta-Pena, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review de novo questions of law. Ramirez-Villalpando v. Holder, 645 F.3d 1035, 1038 (9th Cir.2011). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The agency correctly determined that Huerta-Pena is ineligible for cancellation of removal because his conviction under California Penal Code § 487(a) constitutes an aggravated felony. See 8 U.S.C. §§ 1229b(a)(3), 1101(a)(43)(G) (a theft offense for which the term of imprisonment is at least one year is an aggravated felony); see also Ramirez-Villalpando, 645 F.3d at 1039 (modified categorical approach required to determine whether conviction under California Penal Code § 487(a) is an aggravated felony); United States v. Strickland, 601 F.3d 963, 968-69 (9th Cir.2010) (en banc) (docket sheet may be considered when applying the modified categorical approach).

We lack jurisdiction to consider Huerta-Pena’s contention that the agency should not have considered the felony…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.