United States v. Rene Martinez-Encinas

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 16, 201311-10282California240 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION JAN 16 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 11-10282

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 4:04-cr-01418-DCB

v.

MEMORANDUM*

RENE MARTINEZ-ENCINAS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Wm. Fremming Nielsen, District Judge, Presiding**

Submitted January 15, 2013***

Before: SILVERMAN, BEA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Rene Martinez-Encinas appeals from the judgment revoking supervised

release and the 46-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The Honorable Wm. Fremming Nielsen, Senior United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Washington, sitting by designation. *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Martinez-Encinas’s counsel has filed a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.