Alfredo Lopez Garcia v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
505 F. App'x 656
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 17, 201312-70067California244 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Alfredo Lopez Garcia, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review de novo questions of law, Padilla-Romero v. Holder, 611 F.3d 1011, 1012 (9th Cir.2010) (per curiam), and we deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The agency properly concluded that Lopez Garcia is ineligible for adjustment of status because of his conviction for possession of cocaine in violation of California Health & Safety Code § 11350(a). See 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (a)(2)(A)(i)(II) (a conviction for violating any state or federal law or regulation “relating to a controlled substance,” as defined in 21 U.S.C. § 802 (6), renders an alien inadmissible); 8 U.S.C. § 1255 (a)(2) (alien must be admissible at the time he seeks adjustment of status).

To the extent Lopez Garcia challenges his bond proceedings before the IJ, we lack jurisdiction to consider his challenge because he did not raise it in his brief before the BIA. See Abebe v. Mukasey, 554 F.3d 1203, 1208 (9th Cir.2009) (en banc) (issues not argued in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.