Stanford Bryant v. J. Ochoa

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 30, 201311-55153California675 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION JAN 30 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STANFORD PAUL BRYANT, No. 11-55153

Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 3:07-cv-00200-JM-PCL

v.

MEMORANDUM *

J. TIM OCHOA, Warden, Chief Deputy

Warden, in his official capacity and as an individual; et al.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Jeffrey T. Miller, Senior District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 10, 2012 **

Before: HUG, FARRIS, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Stanford Paul Bryant appeals pro se the district

court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 retaliation action. We have

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Brodheim v. Cry, 584

F.3d 1262, 1267 (9th Cir. 2009), and we…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.