Stanford Bryant v. J. Ochoa
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 30, 201311-55153California675 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION JAN 30 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
STANFORD PAUL BRYANT, No. 11-55153
Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 3:07-cv-00200-JM-PCL
v.
MEMORANDUM *
J. TIM OCHOA, Warden, Chief Deputy
Warden, in his official capacity and as an individual; et al.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Jeffrey T. Miller, Senior District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 10, 2012 **
Before: HUG, FARRIS, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.
California state prisoner Stanford Paul Bryant appeals pro se the district
court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 retaliation action. We have
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Brodheim v. Cry, 584
F.3d 1262, 1267 (9th Cir. 2009), and we…