United States v. Adalid Cardenas

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 31, 201310-50515California252 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 31 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 10-50515

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 3:10-cr-01580-LAB-1 Southern District of California, v. San Diego

ADALID RODRIGUEZ CARDENAS,

ORDER

Defendant - Appellant.

Before: D.W. NELSON and O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges, and SINGLETON, Senior District Judge.*

The memorandum disposition filed in this case on December 20, 2012 is

hereby amended as follows:

On page 4 of the memorandum disposition, delete the sentence in the second

paragraph which states “Cardenas fails to show any prejudice resulting from the

admission of this testimony” and replace it with “No prejudice resulted from the

admission of this testimony.”

With this amendment, the panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing

and rehearing en banc. The panel has voted unanimously to deny the petition for

* The Honorable James K. Singleton, Senior District Judge for the U.S. District Court for the District of Alaska, sitting by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.