Berlan Dicey v. S. Pickens
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 31, 201311-16190California1,177 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION JAN 31 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
BERLAN LYNELL DICEY, No. 11-16190
Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:06-cv-00482-KJN
v.
MEMORANDUM *
S. PICKENS; et al.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Kendall J. Newman, Magistrate Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 5, 2012 ** San Francisco, California
Before: FARRIS, NOONAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
We understand and are sympathetic with one who slips and falls resulting in
injury, but to grant the relief sought we must find constitutional violations or errors
on the part of the trial court. Here, there are none.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). The rejection of a judicial notice request is not itself error. We must
examine the basis for the request.…