United States v. Gerardo Serna-Gonzalez

Good Law
507 F. App'x 690
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 7, 201311-10055California844 words

Opinion

Opinion

ORDER

The Memorandum filed January 25, 2013, is withdrawn and the corrected Memorandum, to be filed concurrently with this order, is substituted in its place.

MEMORANDUM

Gerardo Serna-Gonzalez (“Serna”) pled guilty to four counts covering his transport of methamphetamine and cocaine into the United States. He now appeals his 188-month sentence on four grounds, none of which warrants relief.

1.The district court did not clearly err by denying the request for a minor role adjustment under U.S.S.G. § 3131.2(b). Serna argues that he was a mere courier whose involvement was limited to transporting drugs across the United States-Mexico border. But we have repeatedly recognized that a defendant “may be a courier without being either a minimal or a minor participant.” United States v. Rodriguez-Castro, 641 F.3d 1189, 1193 (9th Cir.2011) (internal quotation marks omitted), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 1061 , 181 L.Ed.2d 778 (2012). Moreover, the district court properly relied on the purity and quantity of drugs to infer that Serna likely did not play a minor role. See U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1, cmt. 9 (“[T]he fact that a defendant is in possession of unusually pure narcotics may indicate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.