Dichter-Mad Family Partners v. United States
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 12, 201311-55577California24,361 words
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DICHTER -MAD FAMILY PARTNERS, No. 11-55577
LLP; PHILIP JAY DICHTER ; CLAUDIA
GVIRTZMAN DICHTER ; RICHARD M. D.C. No. GORDON , 2:09-cv-09061- Plaintiffs-Appellants, SVW-FMO
v.
ORDER AND
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , OPINION
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Stephen V. Wilson, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted January 10, 2013—Pasadena, California
Filed February 12, 2013
Before: Stephen Reinhardt, Kim McLane Wardlaw, and Richard A. Paez, Circuit Judges.
Order; Per Curiam Opinion 2 DICHTER -MAD FAMILY PARTNERS V . UNITED STATES
SUMMARY*
Federal Tort Claims Act
The panel affirmed the district court’s dismissal of an action alleging claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act.
The panel held that the district court correctly concluded that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain appellants’ claims because they fell within the “discretionary function” exception to the United States’ waiver of sovereign immunity in the Federal Tort Claims Act. The…