Dichter-Mad Family Partners v. United States

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 12, 201311-55577California24,361 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DICHTER -MAD FAMILY PARTNERS, No. 11-55577

LLP; PHILIP JAY DICHTER ; CLAUDIA

GVIRTZMAN DICHTER ; RICHARD M. D.C. No. GORDON , 2:09-cv-09061- Plaintiffs-Appellants, SVW-FMO

v.

ORDER AND

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , OPINION

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Stephen V. Wilson, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted January 10, 2013—Pasadena, California

Filed February 12, 2013

Before: Stephen Reinhardt, Kim McLane Wardlaw, and Richard A. Paez, Circuit Judges.

Order; Per Curiam Opinion 2 DICHTER -MAD FAMILY PARTNERS V . UNITED STATES

SUMMARY*

Federal Tort Claims Act

The panel affirmed the district court’s dismissal of an action alleging claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act.

The panel held that the district court correctly concluded that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain appellants’ claims because they fell within the “discretionary function” exception to the United States’ waiver of sovereign immunity in the Federal Tort Claims Act. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.