Qing Zheng v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
508 F. App'x 623
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 13, 201310-73892California371 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Qing Xiong Zheng, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have juris diction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, Gu v. Gonzales, 454 F.3d 1014, 1018 (9th Cir.2006), and we deny the petition for review.

The record does not compel the conclusion that the harms Zheng suffered, even if credible and considered cumulatively, constitute past persecution in China. See Nagoulko v. INS, 333 F.3d 1012, 1016-18 (9th Cir.2003) (petitioner did not suffer significant physical harm and IJ was not compelled to find past persecution). Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s decision that Zheng’s refusal to pay a bribe to an official was a personal action involving no actual or imputed political opinion, see Pagayon v. Holder, 675 F.3d 1182, 1191 (9th Cir.2011) (per curiam), and that he failed to demonstrate that a political opinion would be at least one central reason for any future…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.