United States v. Juan Lopez

Good Law
508 F. App'x 646
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 14, 201312-10269California290 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Juan Ramon Prado Lopez appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 41-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a deported alien found in' the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1826 . We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm but remand to the district court to correct a clerical error in the judgment.

Prado Lopez contends that U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)’s 16-level sentencing enhancement is flawed because it is not based on empirical evidence and because it uses prior convictions in establishing an offense level. This contention fails because this court has recognized that the enhancement reflects Congress’s intent to increase penalties for aliens with prior convictions. See United States v. Ramirez-Garcia, 269 F.3d 945, 947-48 (9th Cir.2001).

Prado Lopez also contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable in light of his employment history and community support. The district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing Lopez’s sentence. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586 , 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007). The sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.