Carlos Montoya v. Kim Jones

Good Law
508 F. App'x 656
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 14, 201311-35695California545 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Carlos Montoya appeals the district court’s dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 . We review de novo the district court’s dismissal of the petition. White v. Martel, 601 F.3d 882, 883 (9th Cir.2010) (per curiam). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253 , and we affirm.

1.Montoya was charged with three counts of lewd conduct with a minor under the age of sixteen, in violation of Idaho Code § 18-1508 . The first count was for “manual/genital contact with the intent of appealing to, arousing, or gratifying the sexual desires of [Montoya].” The second and third counts used the same language, except the second count was for “oral/genital contact” and the third was for “genital/genital contact.” At trial, the jury was told in Instruction No. 18 that the state had to prove, in relevant part, that Montoya had “committed an act of manual-genital contact or oral-genital contact or genital-genital contact or any other lewd or lascivious act upon or with the body of [the victim],” and that the act was intended “to arouse, appeal to, or gratify the lust or passions or sexual desires of either of them.” (emphases…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.