At&t Mobility Llc v. Chunghwa Picture Tubes

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 14, 201311-16188California4,252 words

Opinion

Opinion

M. SMITH, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AT&T MOBILITY LLC; AT&T No. 11-16188

CORP .; AT&T SERVICES, INC.;

BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, D.C. No. INC.; PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE 3:09-cv-04997-SI

COMPANY ; AT&T OPERATIONS,

INC.; AT&T DATACOMM , INC.;

SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE OPINION

COMPANY ,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION ; AU

OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA ,

INC; CHI MEI CORPORATION ; CHI

MEI OPTOELECTRONICS

CORPORATION ; CHI MEI

OPTOELECTRONICS USA, INC.; CMO

JAPAN CO ., LTD .; NEXGEN

MEDIATECH , INC.; NEXGEN

MEDIATECH USA, INC.; CHUNGHWA

PICTURE TUBES LTD .; TATUNG

COMPANY OF AMERICA , INC.; EPSON

IMAGING DEVICES CORPORATION ;

EPSON ELECTRONICS AMERICA , INC.;

HANNSTAR DISPLAY CORPORATION ;

LG DISPLAY CO ., LTD .; LG DISPLAY

AMERICA , INC.; SAMSUNG

ELECTRONICS CO ., LTD .; SAMSUNG

AT&T MOBILITY LLC V . AU OPTRONICS CORP .

SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.; SAMSUNG

ELECTRONICS AMERICA , INC.; SHARP

CORPORATION ; SHARP ELECTRONICS

CORPORATION ; TOSHIBA

CORPORATION ; TOSHIBA AMERICA

ELECTRONICS COMPONENTS, INC.;

TOSHIBA MOBILE…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.