United States v. Angel Meza-Flores

Good Law
509 F. App'x 590
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 15, 201312-50319California350 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FEB 15 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 12-50319

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 3:12-CR-01942-LAB-

v.

MEMORANDUM *

ANGEL MEZA–FLORES,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 13, 2013 ** Pasadena, California

Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, SILVERMAN, Circuit Judge, and RAKOFF, Senior District Judge.***

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Jed S. Rakoff, Senior United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation. Angel Meza–Flores contends that the district court procedurally erred by

failing to consider the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors other than

deterrence, by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.