United States v. Chris Nero

Good Law
510 F. App'x 533
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 20, 201310-10532, 12-10008California358 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Chris Nero appeals his conviction by plea agreement to three counts of At tempted Evasion of Federal Taxes in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7201 . Because the parties are familiar with the factual and procedural history of this case, we repeat only those facts necessary to resolve the issues raised on appeal. We affirm.

We review claims of ineffective assistance of counsel on direct appeal “only under two extraordinary circumstances, ... (1) when the record on appeal is sufficiently developed to permit review and determination of the issue, or (2) when the legal representation is so inadequate that it obviously denies a defendant his Sixth Amendment right to counsel.” United States v. Daychild, 357 F.3d 1082, 1095 (9th Cir.2004) (quoting United States v. Ross, 206 F.3d 896, 900 (9th Cir.2000)). Neither circumstance is present here. The current record contains little more than generalized assertions of incompetence.- Moreover, Nero’s former counsel has had no opportunity to explain her alleged actions. See United States v. Laughlin, 933 F.2d 786, 789 (9th Cir.1991) (rejecting ineffective assistance of counsel claim on direct appeal where defendant’s counsel was not given an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.