Margaret Wilder v. Arizona Board of Regents

MEMORANDUM

Plaintiff-Appellant Margaret Wilder, in her capacity as Personal Representative of the Estate of Theresa Cameron (Camer on), appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment and judgment as a matter of law in favor of Defendants-Ap-pellees on Cameron’s claims of race discrimination under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., 42 U.S.C. § 1981 , and 42 U.S.C. § 1988 , gender discrimination under Title VII, retaliation under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3, and violation of her constitutional right of due process under the Fourteenth Amendment. We review de novo the district court’s grant of summary judgment and judgment as a matter of law, Moore v. Local Union 569 of the IBEW, 989 F.2d 1584 , 1537 (9th Cir.1993), and we affirm.

The district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over Cameron’s Title VII gender discrimination claim because Cameron included no allegation of gender discrimination in her administrative charge before the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). See Lowe v. City of Monrovia, 775 F.2d 998, 1003-04 (9th Cir.1985).

The district court did not err in finding that Cameron failed to make out a prima facie…