United States v. Olaf Juda
Opinion
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Olaf Peter Juda (“Juda”) appeals the modification of his conditions of supervised release and order dismissing his motion to dismiss the supervised release revocation proceedings. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.
I.
We review de novo the district court’s authority to modify Juda’s terms of supervised release, United States v. Miller, 205 F.3d 1098, 1100 (9th Cir.2000), and determine that, having properly considered the statutorily enumerated factors, there was full authority to modify Juda’s conditions of supervised release under 18 U.S.C. § 3583 (e)(2). See United States v. Gross, 307 F.3d 1043, 1044 (2002). Changed circumstances were not required to modify those conditions. See Miller, 205 F.3d at 1100 ; see also, e.g., United States v. Navarro-Espinosa, 30 F.3d 1169, 1171 (9th Cir.1994).
Reviewing for abuse of discretion, United States v. Napulou, 593 F.3d 1041, 1044 (9th Cir.2010), we hold that the imposition of these particular conditions was not an abuse of discretion in light of the nature of Juda’s original offense and post-release behavior. See United States v. King, 608 F.3d 1122, 1131 (9th Cir.2010).