In re Reno
Opinion
Opinion
Werdegar, J.
Filed 10/31/
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
In re RENO ) ) S124660 on Habeas Corpus. ) ____________________________________)
ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND
DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING
THE COURT:
The opinion in this case, filed August 30, 2012, and appearing at 55 Cal.4th 428, is modified as follows: In footnote 23 on pages 478-480 of 55 Cal.4th, delete the following lines: ―Claim No. 12 (same claim as claim No. 10); [¶] Claim No. 16 (admission of Cornejo‘s perjurious testimony at the Evid. Code, § 402 hearing; Memro II, at pp. 827-828);‖ and ―Claim No. 37 (Cornejo‘s testimony violated petitioner‘s Sixth Amend. rights; Memro II, at pp. 827-828);‖ On page 500, second full paragraph on that page, delete the phrase ―and raise the issue in the first petition‖ from the second sentence, which will then read as follows: ―He contends that prior counsel‘s performance was ‗materially deficient‘ in that he failed to adequately investigate the claim and discover triggering facts.‖` This modification of the opinion does not affect the judgment. The petition for rehearing is denied. Filed 8/30/12 (unmodified version)