People v. Munoz CA1/4

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 27, 2013A136521California430 words

Opinion

Opinion

Humes, J.

Filed 2/27/13 P. v. Munoz CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

A136521

v. MICAELLE MUNOZ, (Solano County Super. Ct. No. VCR199303) Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant Micaelle Munoz timely appealed after the trial court ordered that the terms of her probation be modified. Her counsel has asked this court for an independent review of the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) We find no arguable issues and affirm. On August 13, 2009, defendant pleaded no contest pursuant to a plea agreement to one count of grand theft by embezzlement (Pen. Code, § 487, subd. (a)) in connection with taking money from her employer, a Mervyn’s department…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.