Martinez

Martinez v. OneWest Bank CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 27, 2013E055492California3,219 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 2/27/13 Martinez v. OneWest Bank CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

ALEX Z. MARTINEZ et al.,

Plaintiffs and Appellants, E055492

v. (Super.Ct.No. CIVRS910701)

ONEWEST BANK, FSB, et al., OPINION

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. Joseph R. Briscoe,

Judge. Affirmed.

Alex Z. Martinez and Arminda B. Martinez, in pro. per., for Plaintiffs and

Appellants.

Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis, Andrew E. Miller, and Joshua R.

Mandell for Defendants and Respondents.

This is an action originating in defendants’ attempts to foreclose on a trust deed

secured by plaintiffs’…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.