Franck

Franck v. Barrington CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 27, 2013C070091California2,428 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 2/27/13 Franck v. Barrington CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

HERMAN FRANCK, C070091

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 34201000081503CUBCGDS) v.

ROBERT BARRINGTON,

Defendant and Respondent.

Plaintiff Herman Franck, an attorney, represented defendant Robert Barrington, and after Franck sued for unpaid fees, Barrington countersued. The parties arbitrated the dispute, Barrington prevailed, and Franck, representing himself, now appeals from an order confirming the arbitral award. Franck generally seeks review of the merits of the arbitral award. But because Franck does not demonstrate that the arbitrator exceeded its powers, the trial court properly confirmed the arbitral award.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.