People v. Bailey CA2/7

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 26, 2013B241079California3,314 words

Opinion

Opinion

Jackson, J.

INTRODUCTION

A convicted sex offender is required to register in his county of residence. A convicted sex offender who has no place to live is required to register in the county in which he is a transient. If the transient sex offender thereafter acquires a residence, he must register anew within five working days. (Pen. Code,1 §§ 290, 290.011, subd. (b); People v. Aragon (2012) 207 Cal.App.4th 504, 506.) Defendant Charles Bailey, who previously was convicted of a crime requiring him to register as a sex offender pursuant to section 290, appeals from the judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of three counts of being a transient convicted sex offender who failed to register after moving to a residence (§ 290.011, subd. (b)) and three counts of failing to register as a sex offender after an address change (§ 290, subd. (b)), and he admitted that he suffered a prior strike conviction (§§ 667, subds. (b)-(i), 1170.12) and served two prior prison terms (§ 667.5, subd. (b)). The trial court sentenced him to state prison for a total of six years. Defendant‟s sole contention on appeal is that the trial court erroneously allowed the People to present testimony as to efforts made…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.